Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae
Characteristics of Implementability of Emergency Health Systems Guidance Based on AGREE-HS
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000,China;2.Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700,China;3.Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700,China;4.The Second Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
    Abstract:

    Guidance implementation acts as a bridge between theory and practice,enabling the rapid expansion of their impact and application. This study demonstratively evaluated emergency health systems guidance documents (HSG),represented by the COVID-19 emergency HSG,based on the item implementability of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Health Systems (AGREE-HS),aiming to explore the characteristics of implementability in emergency HSG. The evaluation results indicated that the COVID-19 emergency HSG had a low mean score in implementability,which ranked just above the item participants. Criterion 2 (costs and resource considerations for implementing the recommendations) received the highest mean score of 4.29,while criterion 9 (systematic evaluation of implementation) received the lowest mean score of 1.34. The emergency HSG formulated by the World Health Organization(WHO) and those formulated by various countries showed no difference (P=0.114) in criterion 1 (barriers and facilitators to implementation) but had differences (P<0.05) regarding the average item scores and the scores of the remaining criteria. The WHO standard HSG had high overall scores and had differences (P<0.05) in both the mean item scores and the scores of the nine criteria when compared with the emergency HSG. The global/national HSG showed differences in scores of criterion 1 (barriers and facilitators to implementation) compared with the both clinically relevant HSG and material support HSG (P<0.05). Emergency HSG prioritized considerations of implementation costs,resources,and flexibility in terms of implementability,while de-emphasizing aspects such as stakeholder opinions,dissemination strategies,and evaluation of HSG. This may be attributed to the context in which emergency HSG are formulated,given the inherent flexibility and variability of emergency health events. The developers should comprehensively consider the needs and characteristics related to the implementability of emergency HSG during the formulation process.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:July 11,2024
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: November 15,2024
  • Published:

Address:

Postcode:100700

Phone:010-84076882

E-mail:syfjx_2010@188.com

® 2024 All Rights Reserved

Supported by:Beijing E-Tiller Technology Development Co., Ltd.